Author: Victor

A Look at How Generation Z and Millennials View Political Issues

The social landscape of America may soon change for the better. America may soon become a nation of open-minded citizens who respect diversity. This is according to a 2018 study conducted on the views of the Millennial generation and Generation Z on social and political issues.

What exactly comprises these generations? Who are they?

Millennials, or Generation Y, are those born between the early 1980s to mid-1990s. At present, they comprise 25 percent of the U.S. population. Generation Z or Gen Z, as they are often referred to, are those born around the late 1990s to early 2000.

The study, conducted by an independent nonprofit research center – Pew Research, describes Gen Z as better educated and more open-minded than previous generations. It has clear views on how the government is doing, however, this may likely change when they become more mature and are of voting age.

Here are the key findings of the study.

As regards the way President Donald Trump handles government business, only 30 percent of the surveyed Gen Z and 29 percent of the Millennials said Trump is doing the right thing. This is low as compared to the 38% to 54% of the older generations who believe Trump is doing good.

The Millennials and Gen Z wants the government to work harder in solving the country’s problems. The older generations, however, said a lot of the problems are better left to experts. On issues about more women running for office, there is no apparent difference. Most of those surveyed across generations believe it is good for women to be in politics.

Most of the respondents across all generations also said immigrants have made positive contributions to the U.S. government. On issues about race or ethnicity, there was a huge gap between the younger and older generations. Sixty-one to Sixty-two percent of the Millennials and Gen-Z are very much open to racial diversity, as well as interracial relationships. About forty-two to fifty-two percent of the older population said this is not okay.

In terms of party affiliation, it turned out that younger Republicans believe there is a need for the government to improve its performance, while the older ones said it doesn’t need to. On the other hand, there is no debate among Democrats regarding this issue as most of them are one in saying there is a need for government to work harder in solving the country’s problems.

On issues of climate change, there is no marked difference because most of them believe it is the humans who are causing the problem. Lastly, all generations are unanimous in their belief that the current government is going in the wrong direction.

Categories: Uncategorized

How American’s View the U.S. Political System

The American government has been consistent with its ideals of keeping democracy safe and sound in other countries. It has supported liberation plans for countries that are under attack by groups that want to trample on freedom. It sends its troops to ensure this doesn’t happen. How about in the heart of home? Are American’s happy with the democracy they are currently enjoying?

A study that wanted to answer this very same question was conducted in 2018. It gave light to various thoughts concerning the current state of democracy. Some say they don’t see any threats to freedom, while others believe they’re not being heard enough.

The survey conducted by the Pew Research Center initiated varied responses from the public. Some of the noteworthy insights are cited below. The Pew Research Center is an independent nonprofit that conducts various studies through opinion polls and various research methods. It aims to generate data that would help in sound decision-making.

There is a need to make significant changes: Of those surveyed, 58 percent are confident of the democracy they are experiencing at present. This number represents a ratio of six people out of ten who believe democracy is intact.

Despite this confidence, however, a majority of those who answered the survey thinks there is a need to make significant changes to the current political system. Sixty-one percent said the changes will improve the system by adapting it to the present situation.

There is no need to give the president more power: Majority of the respondents believe the president has sufficient powers to address the problems the country is facing. Seventy-six percent of them do not approve of giving the president more powers in order to solve current issues, adding it could put the country at risk.

The person sitting at the presidency hugely influences the populations’ mood: Most of the respondents are one in thought that whoever is sitting as the country’s president generally dictates the populations’ behavior. Sixty-three percent said the sitting president directly affects their personal lives. Forty percent of this number are opinions from women, while twenty-nine percent are from men.

They also believe that the president’s views highly impacts issues of national security, and the U.S.’ status in the world.

Increasing clamor for elected officials to compromise: To put this simply, Americans are getting tired of the political division in the country, and would rather be united on various issues.

In the past, Democrats were highly likely to praise elected officials for compromising, but now, Republicans are catching up. The study found that the Democrats and Republicans are now almost on equal footing regarding this issue – 46% of the Democrats and 44% of the Republicans positively view compromises among politicians.

Local governance is better than national governance: Respondents are more appreciative of local politicians than those who serve in the national government. Sixty-seven percent of those surveyed have a high regard for local politicians, compared to a dismal thirty-five percent who believes national officials are doing good.

Three fourths or 73% of the respondents also said the quality of recent local candidates are better than those before them. Only 41% said the same thing with regards to those who run for national positions.

Categories: Uncategorized

Facebook Will Sharpen Political Advertisement Laws by 2020

As political ad expenditure for 2020 ramps up, Facebook is tightening its guidelines to ensure that political or problem advertising organizations are valid and are not playing the system. The modifications will make it difficult for organizations to dodge Facebook’s political advertising review program with some high-profile examples of such evasion already emerging.

The social media giant is introducing a “confirmed organization” label for U.S. political advertisers to demonstrate their legitimacy by showing government-issued credentials.

All advertisers who run ads on political or social issues will also have to post their contact information, even if they don’t seek the formal label. Advertisers must comply or risk cutting off their advertisements by mid-October this year.

Under regulatory scrutiny,since Russia used social media platforms to interfere with the U.S. presidential election in 2016, since last year, Facebook has been rolling out country-by-country ad transparency tools.

Since May 2018, U.S. political advertisers have been needed by Facebook to place a disclaimer “paid for by” on their advertisements. But the firm said that some used false disclaimers or attempted to register as non-existent organizations. Sarah Schiff, Facebook product manager says, “In 2018 we did see evidence of misuse in these disclaimers and so this is our effort to strengthen the process,”.

Last year, reporters from Vice News succeeded in placing advertisements on behalf of individuals and organizations including the U.S. Vice President Mike Pence and “Islamic State.” Just last week, after using various websites to promote pro-Trump advertisements, Facebook prohibited the conservative news outlet The Epoch Times from advertising on the platform.

Paid Facebook advertisements have become an important instrument for political campaigns and other organizations in targetting voters.

According to Bully Pulpit Interactive, a Democratic company that tracks digital ad spending, President Donald Trump’s reelection campaign has spent about $9.6 million this year on ads on the site making him the top spender among 2020 candidates.

Last year, Facebook started requiring a U.S. mailing address and identity document from political advertisers. They will also have to provide a phone number, company email, and website under the new regulations.

To obtain a “confirmed organization” label, advertisers are required to submit an official email matching Federal Election Commission ID number, tax-registered organization ID number, or public website domain. Facebook has continually revamped its political advertising strategies, which vary from nation to nation.

It introduced an internet political advertising library in 2018, although scientists have criticized the database for being poorly maintained and failing to provide helpful ad targeting data. These requirements represent a favorable step towards internet transparency. Facebook has taken the lead in the construction of a political advertising library since 2016. Other companies are likely to mimic their efforts requiring more scrutiny.

While there are no legal requirements in the U.S. regarding internet political advertising, political advertising on TV is governed. However, these demands still leave space for organizations to conceal their source of financing. For instance, Bloomberg revealed just this week that a group of mysteries has poured $13 million into health care bills advertisements. This is par for the Federal Communications Commission’s broadcast publicity course.

Facebook claims it will make more improvements to its ad library over the coming months and expand its strategy to ban advertisements that expressly prevent individuals in the U.S. from voting.

Categories: Uncategorized

3 Candidates Who Dropped Out of the 2020 Presidential Race

In 2020, dozens of applicants ran for president — but as the lengthy campaign season grinds on, more and more of them fall out of the race.

Richard Ojeda

After losing his parliamentary candidacy in West Virginia, Ojeda threw his hat into the ring for the presidency in November.

Ojeda, a former military parachutist who resigned as a state senator to concentrate on his campaign, voted for Trump in 2016 but rendered his views on the president soured clear.

“I think I relate to the people far more than what the president can ever relate to these people,” he said upon his campaign announcement. “The very people he comes down to West Virginia and stands in front of could never afford one single round of golf in some of his fancy country clubs. That’s not where I stand.”

Ojeda, 48, finally dropped out of the race at the end of January, writing in a way that he didn’t want people to accept money for a campaign that couldn’t compete.

“I want you to know that my fight does not end. I may not have the money to make the media pay attention, but I will continue raising my voice and highlighting the issues the working class, the sick and the elderly face in this nation,” he wrote.

Rep. Eric Swalwell

A long-shot when he announced that he was running in April, Swalwell stuck out his campaign until July, when he became the first candidate to fall out of the race on the debate stage.

The California congressman, 38, was heavily focused on gun violence prevention (he proposed a gun buyback program), climate change, health care, and the student debt crisis.

After his polling and fundraising figures fell short, he said he called it quits, but he pledged to keep fighting for a safer nation.

“After the first Democratic presidential debate, our polling and fundraising numbers weren’t what we had hoped for, and I no longer see a path forward to the nomination,” he stated. “My presidential campaign ends today, but this also is the start of a new passage for the issues on which our campaign ran.”

Sen. Mike Gravel

Before dropping out in August, the 89-year-old former senator from Alaska resulted a brief — and rather non-traditional — campaign.

Gravel, who ran unsuccessfully for president in 2008, first as a Democrat and then as a Libertarian, was persuaded to run by a couple of teenagers and declared his candidacy by claiming that he only wished to get him to the stage of the debate to “push the field left.”

Despite a viral Twitter-heavy campaign, facilitated by 18 year olds, one a high school senior and the other a freshman at Columbia University, Gravel did not managed to qualify for the first discussion in June and missed the voting mark a month later for the second debate.

He fell out on Aug. 6, endorsing Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard since then.

“I’m proud and honored to endorse Sen. Bernie Sanders for the presidency of the United States,” he said in a video on Twitter. “Bernie has a program that benefits all Americans — not just the 1 percent. He will be a great president for all Americans.”

Categories: Uncategorized

Meet Some of the 2020 Presidential Candidates

With the 2020 election less than two years away, there are now more than two dozen applicants on the list — with a variety of backgrounds. Here are some of the noteworthy names.

Andrew Yang

Yang, Venture for America’s 44-year-old founder (described as “a Teach for America for Entrepreneurs” by the New York Times), has been running for president for over a year. He has constructed his campaign on a commitment to provide every American adult with a universal basic income of $1,000 a month.

Yang pushes such a strategy as a reaction to what he thinks could be a financial disaster caused by increased automation, leaving many Americans without jobs, according to the Times.

“I’m a capitalist and I believe that universal basic income is necessary for capitalism to continue,” he tells the paper last year.

“I know the country my sons will grow up in is going to be very different than the one I grew up in,” Yang says on his campaign site, “and I want to look back at my life knowing I did everything in my power to create the kind of future our children deserve.”

According to PBS, Yang lately passed the donor threshold for inclusion among Democratic primary applicants in upcoming discussions where he is likely to create the greatest splash among those without official political experience.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren

The 69-year-old Massachusetts Democrat started her presidential bid at the end of December.

The former teacher of bankruptcy legislation at Harvard — who drew headlines for a DNA test she took to demonstrate she has Native American ancestry — is renowned for promoting more restrictions on Wall Street and large business. She was an advisor to President Obama before entering the Senate.

“If you work hard and play by the rules, you ought to be able to take care of yourself and the people you love,” Warren said in her announcement video.

“We can make our democracy work for all of us,” she continued. “We can make our economy work for all of us.”

Rep. John Delaney

Delaney, a 55-year-old businessman, and former Maryland Congressional representative was running for president almost as soon as President Donald Trump was in office: according to Bostion radio station WBUR, he announced his campaign in July 2017.

Hillary Clinton’s surprising loss “made me say, ‘We have to think differently about everything,” Delaney told WBUR. “We really need to move to a bit of a post-partisan world where we actually start solving problems.”

Delaney described more moderate positions in his interview with WBUR than many of his Democratic peers. He said, for instance, that he promotes “a universal health care system where every American has health care as a basic right” but does not believe in a “Medicare-for-all” backed by the government.

He also said that he thinks in a border safety compromise that involves some physical obstacles between the U.S. and Mexico.

Julian Castro

The former residential and urban development secretary, 44, announced that he was running in San Antonio, Texas, in January, where he was mayor before entering the administration of President Barack Obama. He would become the first Latino president of the country if elected.

Castro, raised by his grandma, a Mexican immigrant, is a long-standing proponent of LGBTQ rights and early childhood education and battled for federal funding to jump green jobs in 2010.

“I am not a frontrunner in this race, but I have not been a frontrunner at any time in my life,” before his official announcement. “My family’s story is a testament to what is possible when this country gets it right.”

Rep. Tulsi Gabbard

The 37-year-old Iraq War veteran, who in the House of Representatives represents sections of Hawaii, announced she was running in January. Gabbard is both the Congress ‘ first member of American Samoan and Hindu. According to Vox, an economic progressive and critical of America’s armed operations overseas, she has been scrutinized for being socially conservative, although she has reversed some of her positions and is pro-choice and now promotes same-sex marriage.

“There are a lot of challenges that are facing the American people that I’m concerned about and that I want to help solve,” when she made her announcement. She added that in her campaign, health care, reform of criminal justice and climate change would be the main problems.

Categories: Uncategorized

Talking Politics – Simple Tips to Have A Healthy Discussion with Friends

We like to chat about lots of things. Individuals have different favorite things to talk about. When you have a specific interest in the brain, you shop for those chats which will satisfy your needs best. In case you love a mature talk, politics is certainly for you. Politics is a subject that many love to keep away from. This is primarily because absolutely nothing conclusive emanates from it. It actually doesn’t matter where you’re, politics will spark various emotions. You will find chats that have completely banned politics from considerations and there are people who specialize in problems that are political. You will discover lots of chat forums that will host politics because of their chosen subject of focus. Life is politics and also, there’s no way of staying away from it at some time in our lives. Thus, the value of politics can’t be underestimated. Nevertheless, when you want to participate in political talk, there are many things that you have to check. In case you’re chatting in chats exactly where politics is typical, there’ll be rules set in position to direct you. Thus, the initial thing before you indulge in the political talk is looking at the rules. Check this out at chiropractor Alexandria

Rules have to be followed for reasons that are numerous. It’s through rules associated with a political talk forum you are going to get to know what’s appropriate and what’s not. The same as a game, you have to determine what to do to ensure that you can gain almost as you can. In this situation, rules are going to enable you to know just how to conduct it. Rules will also demonstrate where the difficulty is and, you are able to stay away from it. For instance, never do attacks that are personal, never use insults to generate your point heard as well as never seem to demean any political figure or maybe a figure in another political context. Put simply, regulations are set available to make certain that your discussions are mature. Criticism needs to be constructive or creative and, when you completely understand this, you’re prepared to perform a political talk. Sometimes, politics appears to not have any rules at all. It’s tough to set the line which you shouldn’t cross. Nevertheless, with correct adherence to rules, you need to stay in a place to chat appropriately.

A political talk must be based on honesty. You need to stay away from major propaganda. Additionally, you shouldn’t insight others or make others believe what you believe. People you’re talking with will, in addition, enjoy an enthusiastic interest in politics and odds are they’ve their own opinion. You shouldn’t be obligated to go along with anyone. Personal sentiments on politics will differ to better degrees. You have to know why you’re chatting in the very first place. Your goal might be seeing what views of others are. You may additionally be searching for solutions. Also, chats are going to enable you to understand several of the points you don’t. Many minds have a better way of dissecting challenges and getting clearer or better understanding of issues. With the above techniques to chat politically, you ought to have a mature talk.

Categories: Blog